|
Forward planning was the key to the practical success of The
Sunbury Millennium Embroidery in so far as a lot of work took place before ever
a decorative stitch was made into the fabric. An important and surprising fact
is that close direction and/or supervision was not a feature of the stitching.
This would probably explain the vivacity of the work. Contrarily people who see
the work assume that it was closely supervised because of how well it all sits
together but if every subject is faithfully interpreted then that should be the
case because Sunbury is naturally an attractive village of compatible buildings
and colours.

|
|
To recruit embroiderers the first step taken by the Committee
was to invite Sunbury people to an exhibition at St. Mary’s Church Hall to
view the design and, if they liked what they saw, then to register as
volunteers. Experience was not one of the criteria – any Sunbury resident who
wanted to help was welcomed with open arms.

|
|
In addition to the display of full scale black and white
drawings of the major panels experienced local embroiderers known to the
Committee put on a display of their own work as an indication of the standard it
was hoped to achieve.

|
|
|
Every subject within the embroideries was drawn in black
waterproof ink on individual pieces of calico and attached to the calicoes were
coloured photographs or illustrations for guidance in respect of colour and fine
detail. Volunteers chose a subject, collected the specific calico, took it home
and, from the illustration provided, selected their threads and set to work with
no more than a brief description of how it should be stitched, the Committee
trusting in their creativity but also trusting that they would be influenced by
the work they had seen at the hall that day. If anyone had a problem they only
had to call on Pam Judd, the Chief Embroiderer, or, later on, any member of the
workroom staff but this was a facility rarely needed. That first day brought in
something in the region of 45 volunteers. When their friends saw what the
volunteers were doing – how stunning it was and how much pleasure it was
generating, the number of volunteers grew rapidly until there was something in
the region of 160 stitchers on the register by the time the work was completed.

|
|
Those stitchers who felt that ‘free embroidery’ was not
their field volunteered to work the 9" canvas squares of the local schools
and organisations based in Sunbury. How little they knew – it was no easier.
Most of the volunteers to do the canvas work were cross stitchers and whilst
circles, geometric shapes and lettering may seem quite straightforward in cross
stitch they are much more difficult to achieve in the half cross or tent stitch
which was specified and so the ‘free’ embroiderers admired the canvas
workers and vice-versa.

|
|
|
The other common misconception, but amongst the free
embroiderers, was that a small piece might be easier to work than a large one,
but quality in a small piece is much more difficult to achieve when it is
representational work and so, again the result was mutual admiration.

|
|
In the very early days both the Chief Embroiderer and
John Stamp, the Chief Designer, each worked a complete side panel – the
Conservation Panel and the Tradition (Swan Upping) panel. This was done in the
hope that some of the volunteers might also work a complete panel but none of
them felt that they had the confidence or the time to take on such an ambitious
task and so the side panels were worked, as was the Village Panel, by applying
individual embroidered slips to the backgrounds as they were created.

|
|
|
It took 2 ½ years of people working in their own homes to
produce the individual subjects (slips) and a further 15 – 18 months to put
the whole embroidery together. During that 4 year period the army of canvas
workers produced some 70 individual logos on the 9" squares and an equal
number of spacer squares of a heraldic design to match that used for the
kneelers in St. Mary’s Church. The logos were worked on 12 to the inch double
canvas and the spacers on 10 to the inch mono. Double thickness cotton a broder
was used for the logos and Anchor soft for the spacers. All canvas stitchery was
in half cross or tent stitch, according to the preference of the embroiderer.
Where particularly fine detail was required within a logo the double canvas was
split to do petit point.

|
|
The stitchery in the free embroidered panels was not
complicated. Applied fabrics were used for smooth walls and satin stitch blocks
for brick walls. Individual ingenuity came into play where rooftops were
concerned – fine Offray ribbon was couched to represent slate tiles –
wonderful colour mixes of textured threads were couched down to represent older,
moss encrusted rooftops and cloud stitch was worked over painted felt. Windows
were another interesting area – some were embroidered in long and short stitch
with suitable shading, some had ready-made lace applied, some had sheer fabrics
to represent the glass and one even had small pieces of acetate set in front of
the general view of the inside of the rooms. Multi-coloured furnishing fabric
made a wonderful stained glass window, the stonework being stitched over it.

|
|
|
It was left to the embroiderers discretion whether they
padded the fish and fowl that appear in the foreground. Some slips were left
flat, some were padded with polyester wadding as they were applied to the
background (such as the heads and the crops of the ducks and the heron). The
swan was worked on the calico but over multiple layers of felt in the way that
padding is built up under gold kid, small contours of felt covered by larger and
larger contours, each stitched down individually so that the three dimensional
effect tapers to the outer edge, the embroidery then being worked through all
layers.

|
|
The majority of threads used were traditional stranded
cottons and lesser amounts of rayon, silk and even very small amounts of crewel
wool. A rayon knitting yarn that could be unravelled into a foam of fine thread
was randomly applied and couched to form roughcast walls and was used to create
loose foliage for the window boxes, creepers and trees.

|
|
|
Long and short stitch and satin stitch are probably the most
used stitches in the work but others include French knots (of course) detached
chain (lazy daisy) couching, stem stitch, oyster stitch, fly stitch and straight
stitch. Machine stitchery was used to apply the gold kid lettering and for
background trees (on vanishing fabric) on the Community Panel and for the
background lettering on the Historical/Archæological panel.

|
|
After 2 ½ years of working independently the time came for
the joint effort of putting everything together in the workroom which was open
to the public at all times. As the pieces of work were brought into the workroom
they were, if necessary, stretched but as all the embroiderers had been
encouraged to work on square frames this was not a big problem. These slips were
steamed and cut out. Large pieces were cut out with ¼" reserve to be
turned under and they were backed with an iron-on fabric similar to a very fine
iron-on Vilene but of a more paper-like and slightly stiffer texture. Smaller or
more intricate pieces of embroidery were sealed around the outside edge of the
embroidery with Fray Check – a liquid which dries completely colourless –this
allows cutting very close to the stitchery without fear of fraying. However,
great care was taken to ensure that the Fray Check was only on the background
fabric to be cut away and was not allowed to seep into the embroidery. This was
a very delicate operation as was cutting out each individual piece, sometimes
under a magnifier and using a scalpel.

|
|
|
As the slips were cut out they were stored on table tops and
covered with Perspex to protect them from inquisitive fingers (or even light
ones).

|
|
The eight side panels, being a mere 2ft x 3ft each, were
mostly assembled by experienced workers within their own homes but the Village
Panel, measuring 9 ft x 3ft., was assembled in the public workroom under the
supervision of the three workroom co-ordinators who worked four days each week.
Other embroiderers assisted as and when they were able to give the time. Work
parties were very limited in size because there was a very specific and close
order in which to apply the pieces, working from the back forward. The only time
that it was possible to have more than three workers at a time at the frame was
to work the sky and the water below the river area, which were worked in single
stranded embroidery cotton in long and short stitch.

|
|
|
The cotton duck background fabric for the Village panel was
mounted on a slate frame which measured 11.6" x 3.6", the rollers were
made from staircase hand rail and the sides from flat hardwood. The cotton duck
was nailed to the rollers, stretched to full size and the sides laced. It was
set upon three trestles with three wooden bars pushed between the rollers to
prevent the work from contracting through the flexing of the rollers. These bars
were moved along to help to hold the work at full stretch in whatever area was
being worked) and were revised in size each time the frame was unrolled to
extend the working area.

|
|
11’6 x 3’6 of blank fabric is a very exciting and very
daunting spectacle. The earliest fund raising effort for the project was to
place a grid over a scaled down drawing of the Village Panel and to sell off the
squares to sponsors. Each square took a reference from numbers along the top
edge of the drawing and letters of the alphabet down the sides. Taken up to full
scale this resulted in 2" squares drawn over the design and this we copied
on to the blank duck by tacking the squares in blue cotton and writing the
numbers and letters on the outer edges of the fabric thus giving a grid
reference for the placement of each piece of embroidery. Not every embroidered
building that came in remained square once it came off the working frame and
after stretching them it was possible to make them relate well one to the other
by visually lining up the truest horizontal or vertical lines within the
embroidery with those of the grid tackings creating another use for the grids.

|
|
|
The method of applying the slips to the background varied
according to the individual pieces to be applied. Large uncomplicated shapes
such as the buildings simply had the small outer reserve of fabric turned under
and the pieces were stitched in place by small stitches at right angles to the
slip, bringing the needle up through the background fabric only and down through
all layers. The smaller and more complicated slips which had been cut close to
the stitchery were applied by stitching whenever possible in the same direction
as they had been worked, sometimes attaching from within the shape, sometimes
enclosing the edges, whatever method was sympathetic to the individual slip.
Even with a small slip it may have been necessary to fasten on and off as many
as half a dozen times within one small slip just to keep the colour match.

|
|
To get a more realistic appearance it was, of course,
necessary for some buildings to partly obscure others and where a section was to
be obscured this was indicated on the original drawings on the calico so that an
embroiderer would not waste time or effort on an area that would be hidden.

|
|
|
The River Thames was worked by John Stamp and instead of
working on calico he opted to work on the same cotton duck fabric that was used
for the background – very much thicker than calico. He also chose to use all
six strands of stranded cotton to get the very bold effect he was seeking. The
only problem that that created for the staff assembling the embroidery was that
on the odd occasion a small area had to be filled in to fit against one of the
slips, to imitate his style the ladies found it necessary to work with a pair of
pointed nosed pliers in each hand just to push and pull the needle. Six strands
of thread through the needle equalled twelve strands plus the eye of the needle
being taken through two layers of duck and that was very hard on the fingers.

|
|
The plan had been to work every subject off frame and then to
apply them to the background as that was created but as time went on it became
clear that several important features that were unfortunately to the back of the
work had been overlooked and so these had to be embroidered directly on to the
background fabric butting up to the pieces already in place. These included the
eclipse (which occurred in August 1999 whilst the embroidery was being
constructed), the Lutheran Church and the Police Station.

|
|
|
Stretching the Village Panel was particularly difficult
simply because of its size and so it will be allowed to settle and then
stretched again (and again if necessary).

|
| Advice has been taken from the Conservation
Department of the National Trust on mounting the embroidery and this
will comprise a light wooden framework covered on both sides with double
faced acid free corrugated card, itself covered in bump or Domette
before the embroidery is stretched over it. Current thinking is that
textiles should not be encased in airtight conditions but that there
should be a free flow of air around the work. Lighting and general
presentation will be decided upon once the gallery is built but we do
know that good housekeeping and constant temperature and humidity will
be important factors. |
|
|
 |
|